NYC Free Speech Threat Assessment
Reporting on Risks to the Right to Protest in New York City
The NYCLU “Free Speech Threat Assessment” reporting project documents risks to the right to protest as a result of heavy-handed NYPD policing and harassment of individuals engaged in First Amendment activity. The NYCLU has been dedicated to monitoring and responding to the needs of Occupy Wall Street protesters since the movement’s inception, as we have done in other mass protests, including the Republican National Convention protests in 2004.
While many mainstream media accounts of policing protest activity have focused on incidents involving excessive use of force, these periodic “Free Speech Threat Assessment” reports highlight repeated incidents of often under-the-radar harassment and intimidation by law enforcement against protestors. These reports are meant to highlight the fact that under-the-radar harassment of protest activity by law enforcement is often more pervasive, and may present as great a deterrent impact on freedom of expression and assembly as occasional incidents of mass arrest or dramatic and well-publicized excessive force.
This website will be updated with periodic reports that summarize policing activity in order to identify and analyze trends that may have a chilling effect on the constitutionally protected right to free speech and assembly.
These reports consist of compilations of observations from legal observers, accounts from protesters and members of the public, news reports, and video. Each report summarizes recent trends in NYPD’s policing of protest in the time period covered by the report, and highlights examples of NYPD’s intimidating and harassing conduct toward First Amendment activity.
It is our hope that these reports will both raise the general public’s awareness of policing practices and motivate people, including policy makers, to advocate for reforms of law enforcement’s response to protest activity.
Free Speech Threat Assessment # 1: March 17 to April 10, 2012
The NYPD’s approach to public protest from March 17 to April 10, 2012 was characterized by multiple instances of unnecessary uses of force, pervasive selective enforcement of laws, targeting of journalists, the continued and excessive use of barricades, and surveillance of people engaged in legal activities. Click to download.
Free Speech Threat Assessment # 2: April 11, 2012 to April 28, 2012
The NYPD’s approach to public protest from April 11, 2012 to April 28, 2012 was characterized by the excessive use of barricades, continued selective enforcement of laws, as well as harassment and arrests without legal cause, some excessive force, and the disparate treatment of non-credentialed journalists. Click to download.
Free Speech Threat Assessment # 3: April 29, 2012 to May 29, 2012
The NYPD’s approach to public protest from April 29, 2012 to May 29, 2012 was characterized by continued excessive barricading, the harassment of journalists and others taking pictures, the selective enforcement of laws, unjustified arrests, and numerous instances of excessive force. Click to download.
Free Speech Threat Assessment # 4: May 30, 2012 to June 17, 2012
The NYPD’s approach to public protest from May 30, 2012 to June 17, 2012 was characterized by continued extensive barricading and restriction of protesters’ movement, use of force, the mistreatment of journalists, illegal surveillance, the selective enforcement of laws, and unjustified arrests. Click to download.
Free Speech Threat Assessment #5: June 17, 2012 to August 1, 2012
The NYPD’s approach to public protest from June 17, 2012 to August 1, 2012 was characterized by the excessive use of force, mistreatment of journalists, multiple restrictions of protesters’ movement, selective enforcement of laws, harassment and unjustified arrests. Click to download.
Free Speech Threat Assessment #6: August 1, 2012 to August 31, 2012
The NYPD’s approach to public protest from August 1, 2012 to August 31, 2012 was characterized by the excessive use of force, mistreatment of journalists, multiple restrictions of protesters’ movement, selective enforcement of laws, harassment and unjustified arrests. Click to download.
Free Speech Threat Assessment #7: September 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012
The NYPD’s approach to public protest from September 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 was characterized by the excessive use of force, mistreatment of journalists, multiple restrictions of protesters’ movement, selective enforcement of laws, harassment and unjustified arrests. Click to download.
How to get involved: We welcome information from legal observers, the media, protesters and the general public, including documentation of incidents where possible. If you witness an instance of harassment or infringement of rights by the NYPD against protesters, please contact the NYCLU at email@example.com. If you are interested in becoming a legal observer, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org to gain more information about being a NYCLU legal observer and any upcoming trainings.
POLICING TRENDS AND IMPACT
INTERFERENCE WITH REPORTERS, CITIZEN JOURNALISTS AND LEGAL OBSERVERS
Reporters, legal observers, and the general public all have a First Amendment right to observe, take pictures, and otherwise document police activity as long as they are not interfering with police and obeying all other laws. However, there have been numerous reports of police unjustly prohibiting both journalists and civilians from taking pictures and video footage. Some officers have even broken or confiscated cameras and deleted photos.
While the NYPD is well aware of these rights, the Department has created a selective credentialing system that only permits a small minority of primarily mainstream journalists the ability to cross police lines and get closer to scenes of events than citizen journalists and members of the public. However, the police, on occasion, even infringe on the freedom of these credentialed members of the press, blocking their cameras, keeping them away from scenes of protest, and sometimes arresting and injuring them. The subjective suppression and violence that the NYPD employs against journalists of all stripes, as well as citizens, not only impedes the press from fulfilling their duties but intimidates others who wish to document police activity.
BARRICADES AND IMPEDIMENTS TO MOVEMENT
The First Amendment protects freedom of assembly as well as freedom of speech. However, barricades are frequently used to impede lawful protest activity in New York City. While some barricade uses, such as lining streets with barricades during a march, are not inherently problematic, barricades are also used to unreasonably prevent or hinder people from entering or exiting public spaces, such as parks or sidewalks. Even where barricades surrounding public spaces have clear and accessible openings, the effect of standing in such a restricted area causes some people to feel unease and deters some protesters from taking part in protest activity in such spaces. This is particularly true in spaces like Zuccotti Park, which, for two months, was barricaded except for two small openings where security guards were stationed to search the possessions of all persons attempting to enter.
SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND FALSE ARRESTS
Protesters have a right to equal enforcement of the laws, which includes not being subjected to law enforcement merely because of the exercise of a protected right, as well as a Fourth Amendment right not to be arrested without cause. Protesters are routinely arrested and harassed due to the NYPD and Parks Department’s selective enforcement of minor regulations, including a great many laws on the books that are never or rarely enforced in other circumstances. For example, protesters have been harassed and arrested for holding large banners, placing signs on the ground, walking in the street for a short period of time, sleeping on a sidewalk, using tables to distribute food and literature, drawing with chalk, speaking or playing instruments too loudly, being present in public parks normally open to the public after curfew, dancing, singing, wearing masks, having large bags, and using blankets.
Oftentimes, those engaged in protest are not even aware that they are violating rules for behavior that was permissible just days prior. This creates a heightened state of stress for protesters wishing to be law abiding, who are merely confused by the seemingly ever-changing rules imposed by New York City law enforcement officers. The uncertainty and discomfort caused by heightened monitoring by law enforcement also discourages would-be protesters from assembling and exercising their First Amendment rights.
SURVEILLANCE, RECORDING AND MONITORING OF PUBLIC PROTEST
The constant NYPD surveillance of lawful protest raises serious concerns about the chilling effect on First Amendment activity, and about the NYPD’s compliance with a longstanding court order that prohibits the NYPD from documenting and creating dossiers on people engaged in legal protest activity. There is heavy video surveillance of lawful protest by NYPD officers all over New York City, especially Manhattan. This includes both NYPD operated cameras and private cameras attached to businesses that are accessible to police. NYPD TARU (Technical Assistance Response Unit) officers carry video cameras and frequently videotape protesters doing nothing more than standing or walking on sidewalks, as well as other legal activities.
In addition, police officers are regularly deployed, sometimes in great numbers, to the sites of peaceful protests where they visually monitor protest activities. Plainclothes police officers as well as undercover officers are also permitted to attend protests as well as public meetings without identifying themselves as police officers. The persistent videotaping of protesters, and the obvious police presence, is unnerving and sometimes even frightening to those who wish to engage in legal protest activity without feeling that their movements are being monitored and personal information compiled by law enforcement.
UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE AND OVERPOLICING
Protesters have a right to be free from undue force under the First and Fourth Amendments. However, large scale protests in New York City are occasionally punctuated by unnecessary uses of force. Examples of unnecessary force used against non-violent protestors include: hitting protesters with batons, punching, pushing and shoving, ramming protesters with scooters, and violent arrests. Unnecessary force is often witnessed during times when police are attempting to disperse a crowd or force protesters to move in a certain direction.
Regardless of whether protestors are seriously injured as a result of this use of police force (although they occasionally are), fear of injury can cause protesters to think twice before attending a demonstration or march, chilling First Amendment expression. Moreover, even where no force is used, the sheer number of police with scooters, batons, guns, and riot gear present at any given event can have an intimidating effect on those present and on those who are deterred by this show of force from participating at all in First Amendment activity.
Significantly, this display of force not only intimidates protesters, but has a chilling impact on other non-protestors who might be interested in observing the protest or speaking with protestors about the issues that are the subject matter of their speech. This is especially the case where police monitor and videotape those entering and exiting gatherings, form barriers between protesters and onlookers, and where onlookers are constantly told to move because they are blocking pedestrian traffic if they stop--even briefly--to watch an assembly.