
February 15, 2005 VIA FACSIMILE AND REGULAR MAIL Chancellor Joel I. Klein New York City Department of Education Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly New York City Police Department Dear Chancellor Klein and Commissioner Kelly: We write to you regarding a recent controversy that raises important questions about the authority of a school principal to control the educational environment within the school and to protect children, and the inappropriate intrusion into this authority by School Safety Agents (SSAs) and police officers assigned to New York City schools. The New York Civil Liberties Union is concerned that certain policies and practices of SSAs and/or police officers in city schools subvert the authority of school principals. We are also concerned that the written guidelines governing SSAs and school-assigned police officers do not clearly recognize this authority and that the officer involved in the incidents of February 3, 2005 at the Bronx Guild High School exceeded the proper role of police officers in the schools. Finally, we are troubled by the removal of a principal and school aide from their school and seek their prompt return to the Bronx Guild community. The facts as we understand them from the Bronx Guild community are as follows. On February 3, 2005, a police officer assigned to Adlai E. Stevenson High School, an impact school that also houses the small, non-impact Bronx Guild High School, barged into a Bronx Guild classroom without permission from its principal in order to arrest a student. In doing so, Officer Juan Gonzalez disrupted the educational process, alarmed students, and ultimately arrested Principal Michael Soguero and School Aide James Burgos while they were trying to do their jobs as educators. Not one published account or report received by the New York Civil Liberties Union has indicated that there was any need or justification for Officer Gonzalez to enter the classroom without permission. As a result of the February 3 incident, Principal Soguero and School Aide Burgos were removed from their positions at Bronx Guild, and the student who was the cause of Officer Gonzalez’s actions was later arrested by others and charged with disorderly conduct. The school officials spent a night in jail. The student spent two, before being released with a Desk Appearance Ticket. As things stand now, Bronx Guild has lost its principal and a valued aide indefinitely, and all three face criminal charges. While Officer Gonzalez has been removed from Bronx Guild, we understand that he may still be in a student environment. We are struck by the fact that although two school officials have been removed from their school, a police officer who has pending against him a Civilian Complaint Review Board complaint alleging that he placed a student in a chokehold on January 18, 2005 may remain in a school setting. Certainly people who are dangerous to students should not be in schools. We question, however, whether the appropriate action has been taken against the appropriate people here. Procedures governing School Safety Agents and school-assigned police officers New York Education Law clearly establishes the authority of principals over their schools. The Chancellor’s Regulations and the New York City Police Department Patrol Guide, however, do not reflect the state legislative mandate or the sound principle of school governance. The deficiencies and contradictions in the Chancellor’s Regulations and the NYPD Patrol Guide must be corrected. The relevant sections of the state Education Law, the Chancellor’s Regulations and the Patrol Guide are set forth here:
- Under section 2590-i(1) of the state Education Law, “[t]he principal shall be the administrative and instructional leader of the school. . . . ”
- Patrol Guide section 215-13 states that “the desires of school personnel may be considered” by a police officer in determining whether a student arrest is warranted and that “the views of school personnel are NOT controlling.” (capitalization in original) This provision is clearly at odds with Patrol Guide sections 215-16 and 215-17 and Chancellor’s Regulation A-412 III(b), cited below.
- Under section 215-16 of the Patrol Guide, the jurisdiction of SSAs and school-assigned police officers is over “public school-related criminal incident[s].” This section further states: “When a public school-related criminal incident occurs: a. On public school grounds . . . SCHOOL SAFETY AGENT/U.M.O.S. [Uniformed Member of the Service] ASSIGNED TO THE SCHOOL 1. Request police response . . . 2. Request School Safety Agent Level 3 to respond. 3. Notify school principal/designee.”
- Patrol Guide section 215-17 states that, “[w]hen taking police action at Board of Education facilities . . . [a] uniformed member of the service [should] . . . 2. Confer with principal/school staff, except if exigent circumstances exist, when entering Board of Education school/facility to take police action.”
- Chancellor’s Regulation A-412 III(b) states: “If the incident does not require an immediate arrest or other immediate action, the SSA and/or NYPD must, to the fullest extent practicable, consult with the principal/designee prior to placing the student under arrest or issuing any form of criminal process.”
- What written guidelines, protocols or other materials, if any, aside from those identified above, govern the actions of police officers and SSAs in schools?
- What special training and/or training materials are provided to police officers, SSAs, and school officials regarding the practices and policies of police officers and SSAs in schools?
- Is there ongoing coordination and oversight of such trainings?
- Is there joint training of school officials, and SSAs/school-assigned police officers?
- When there is a conflict over disciplining a student, whose decision prevails: the principal’s, the teacher’s, the SSA’s, or the police officer’s?
- What is the procedure for a parent, student, or school employee to follow if s/he has a question or complaint about the conduct of SSAs or police officers? How are members of the school community notified of the procedure?
- What mechanisms, if any, are in place to evaluate the activities of police officers and SSAs in schools?
- How are the numbers of SSAs and police officers per school determined?
- What weapons, if any, do police officers and SSAs carry in schools (including, but not limited to guns, mace, pepper spray, “stink bombs”)?