NYCLU to Court: Mayor Adams’s Refusal to Implement NYC Solitary Ban is Illegal
Civil Liberties Union
“While the City of Binghamton may disagree with the State legislature’s regime,” said Donna Lieberman, Executive Director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, “it may not adopt a local ordinance that is entirely inconsistent with the State’s determination as to how best to protect the public by regulating the behavior of convicted sex offenders upon release from prison. In addition, the prescription of criminal punishments for sex offenders is up to the State Legislature. Binghamton may not impose further layers of punishment, especially banishment.”
The Binghamton ordinance undermines State policies and interests. It ignores registration and identification requirement and impedes law enforcement officials from knowing where the ex-offenders are living. It completely disregards the State’s interest in rehabilitating ex-offenders who live with their families and pursue gainful employment. And it creates an additional burden on surrounding municipalities.
The Binghamton ordinance has set off a statewide rush by localities around New York State to enact similar ordinances. Unless the courts invalidate this ordinance, a patchwork of conflicting local laws regulating the behavior of convicted sex offenders will occur across New York State – all in conflict with the State’s policy.
The Binghamton ordinance comes at a time when the New York State Legislature is considering some 80 additional bills – all intended to strengthen further the provisions of New York State’s Megan’s Law.
Oral argument in the case is scheduled to take place on September 23, 2005.
Click here to read the NYCLU friend-of-the-court brief. (Requires the free Adobe Reader.)