NYCLU Know Your Rights Resources to Protect New Yorkers Targeted by Trump
Civil Liberties Union
The organizations filed the brief in support of appellant Stephanie P., a homeless woman struggling with drug addiction, who came before the court in proceedings on the placement of her child with a trusted relative. The Court’s order in effect requires her to abstain from sex, use birth control, get sterilized, or seek an abortion in the event of pregnancy in order to avoid violating the order and potentially facing jail time.
Today’s brief was filed by medical and public health professionals who prioritize the protection of the health and well being of children and families. On that basis, the groups object to the dramatic and potentially far-reaching policy implications of the Court’s “no-pregnancy order,” arguing that such a condition sets a dangerous precedent for allowing courts to monitor reproductive choices made by vulnerable groups — particularly low-income people and people of color, who are already disproportionately involved in the child welfare system.
“If the state really wants to protect children, it should ensure ready access to drug treatment for women facing addiction, especially pregnant women — and it should address the problems that poor families face regarding housing, health care, and nutrition,” said Bernadette Hoppe, JD, MPH, president of the New York Perinatal Association, and one of the experts signing the brief. “Threatening a woman with punishment for getting pregnant will only steer her away from getting the medical care she needs, for fear of being detected.”
Dr. Ernest Drucker, professor in the departments of epidemiology, family and social medicine, and psychiatry at Montefiore Medical Center /Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City, who was also a signatory to the brief, said: “Forbidding poor people from procreating is not only unconstitutional, it is a throwback to eugenics arguments made at the turn of the century.”
The brief further argues that the Court’s decision relies on flawed evidence and that the “no pregnancy condition” violates Stephanie P.’s fundamental rights to reproductive decision-making and personal autonomy under state, federal, and international human rights laws.
The signatories’ position aligns them with every leading medical organization to address this issue, including the American Medical Association, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Nurse Midwives, The American Academy of Pediatrics, and the March of Dimes. All agree that the problem of alcohol and drug use during pregnancy is a health issue best addressed through education and community-based treatment, not through coercive intrusions by the state.
Amici were represented by Lynn Paltrow and Tiloma Jayasinghe of National Advocates for Pregnant Women and Galen Sherwin and Corinne Carey of the New York Civil Liberties Union. A complete list of signatories to the brief appears below.
Organizations
Individuals
Click here to read the brief (PDF).